Health systems decisions should be informed by the best available evidence, and systematic reviews and rapid reviews provide mechanisms through which such evidence can be provided in a timely way. Therefore, SAI hosted by the Health Systems Research Unit (HSRU) of the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), and funded by the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (Alliance), aims to:
- Develop institutional capacity in low - and middle-income countries for conducting and packaging of systematic reviews on health policies and systems research;
- Conduct reviews that are policy-relevant at the national level and could be relevant to the needs of other countries in the region; and
- Disseminate the reviews and related products to potential users, particularly decision-makers, and to promote their uptake and use.
Our rapid evidence synthesis service for public health policy makers, practitioners, and civil society
Most rapid reviews are generated in and for high-income settings. Our service aims to address the gap for such a service in lower and middle-income countries. We provide rapidly produced, high-quality, synthesised evidence to ensure that policy decisions are informed by best-available evidence. Policy makers, practitioners, and civil society are invited to send us requests for synthesised evidence on health systems issues that focus on:
- Human resources
- Information management
- Service delivery
The products we offer
- A truncated standard effectiveness systematic review within five months
- A 15 - working days’ synthesis
- A five - working days’ synthesis
- Policy briefs and lay review reports for non-specialist audiences
- Training and capacity development
A very useful resource regarding rapid evidence syntheses is: Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide, 2017 that can be downloaded from: http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/publications/rapid-review-guide/en/.
Systematic reviews that are hosted by SAI are:
- Review 2: Routine Health Information System (RHIS) interventions to improve health systems management add link
- Review 3: mHealth add link
- Review 5: Integrated Community Case Management (iCCM)
Should you wish to receive any more information on any or all of the reviews, or wish to inform us of your particular interest in our reviews, please contact: Arrie Odendaal (SAI coordinator): email@example.com
How to find evidence pretty darn quickly
Download the presentation of the webinar by clicking this link: What is PDQ-Evidence
Presented by: Gabriel Rada ( Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Co-founder and President of the Epistemonikos Foundation) in conjunction with the ARCADE project of the Karolinska Institutet and the Epistemonikos Foundation in Chile.
|Useful resources to health policy and systems research and systematic reviews|
The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research aims to promote the generation and use of health policy and systems research (HPSR) as a means to improve health and health systems in developing countries.
The South African Cochrane Centre is the only Cochrane Centre in Africa and serves as the reference Centre for individuals in the following African countries: Benin, Botswana, Cameroon, Comoros, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
The Centre for Health Policy (CHP)
Centre for Evidence-based Health Care (CEBHC)
Core activities of the CEBHC include research, teaching and knowledge translation, and the CEBHC has a dedicated Biostatistics Unit.
Cochrane Collaboration is a global independent network of health practitioners, researchers, patient advocates and others, responding to the challenge of making the vast amounts of evidence generated through research useful for informing decisions about health. It is a not-for-profit organisation with collaborators from over 120 countries working together to produce credible, accessible health information that is free from commercial sponsorship and other conflicts of interest.
The Norwegian Satellite of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Review Group [the link stays the same] aims to support the production of Cochrane reviews that address health systems questions relevant to low- and middle-income countries.
PDQ (pretty darn quick) - evidence for informed health policy-making. The site provides quick access to the best evidence for informing decisions about health systems.
Health Systems Evidence is the world's most comprehensive, free access point for evidence to support policymakers, stakeholders and researchers interested in how to strengthen or reform health systems or in how to get cost-effective programs, services and drugs to those who need them.
The EPPI-Centre is committed to informing policy and professional practice with sound evidence. It is involved in:
Campbell Systematic Reviews is the peer-reviewed monograph series of systematic reviews prepared under the editorial control of the Campbell Collaboration. Campbell Systematic Reviews summarise the international research evidence on the effects of interventions in crime and justice, education, international development, and social welfare.
3ie (International Initiative for Impact Evaluation) funds impact evaluations and systematic reviews that generate high quality evidence on what works in development and why. Evidence on development effectiveness can inform policy and improve the lives of poor people.
National Voices, the health and care charity coalition, is launching a new set of take-away resources which set out the best ways to engage people and make person centred care happen. Called Evidence for Person Centred Care, this rich set of resources is designed to make it easy for commissioners and providers to access, understand and make use of the best evidence for various approaches to involving people in their health and healthcare. Five ‘simple guide’ booklets can be quickly downloaded to use in making value cases for patient and service user involvement.”